The Green Party is experiencing a surge in membership following the Referendum in Scotland and UKIP's by-election result.
Sunday, 19 October 2014
Labels:
green party,
London,
March,
October 18,
pay rise,
TUC
Friday, 17 October 2014
No More Austerity:Britain needs a Pay Rise-Join the TUC March Tomorrow
Many Brent residents and trade unionists will be joining the TUC March tomorrow. Green Party actvists will be there.
More details about the march and testimonies fro mvarious workers are available HERE
Brent's closure of Stonebridge Adventure Playground would renege on HAT regeneration agreement
The Trustees of Brent Play Association (of which I am one) have sent the following letter to Brent councillors as the fight to save the Stonebridge Adventure Playground continues:
Following our previous correspondence regarding the Stonebridge Adventure Playground I am responding to the consultation document in which the Adventure Playground is replaced by a small ‘kick about’ play area situated adjacent to the Hillside / Harrow Road.I cannot believe that everyone concerned with this proposal has completely lost touch with the current situation regarding the day-to-day lives of our children outside of school hours.Whatever school representatives may say, even primary schools now employ classroom assistants who are directed to supervise play times, with particular regard to curtail fighting and bullying. This is an area of concern that has increased in recent years. Can you imagine parents, or Ofsted’s response to a school, which allowed the children out at playtime with no adult supervision whatsoever? Recently we have heard many serious concerns from parents about the large unsupervised play area in Lawrence Road, which included a deputation of parents asking us how to go about closing it down. Why?· it is dark after school for more than 3 months of the year,· rain, with no indoor facilities· the area is often used as a meeting / hanging out place for older teenagers· there have been shootings and other gun-related issues in and around this playground· used syringes can be found there· dogs are exercised there· no supervision leads to anti-social behavior including bullying, swearing, smoking, drinking alcohol, and vandalism .· no access to toilets or drinking waterDue to all of the above parents tell their children that if they are allowed to play out they must avoid this playground. The days of parents letting their children go out to play unsupervised are over.Where unsupervised playgrounds of this kind are used it is always with a parent being present. We therefore believe that the new children’s play space within the proposal to expand Stonebridge school will be a danger to children and young people.When the redevelopment of Stonebridge began the Housing Action Trust (HAT), Brent Council officers, and selected residents agreed that due to the huge amount of 4-19 year olds in this ward there would need to be two separate facilities offering supervised indoor and outdoor opportunities. The Pavilion was built for older teenagers and upwards, and it was agreed by all that the Adventure Playground was already providing the appropriate facility for the younger age group, so a new premises was not needed. The proposed closure of the Adventure Playground is reneging on this agreement, and leaves the children with nothing.
Save the playground for him and other children growing up in Stonebridge & the surrounding area |
We have been the custodians of this very special place for over 40 years.It is the only one of its kind, dedicated exclusively to children and young people, in Brent, involving them directly in the decision-making, and day-to-day management of the Centre. It is therefore highly valued by its users past and present, and has contributed to their development in all areas of life.
Stonebridge Adventure Playground should therefore be, as promised, kept and improved for future generations of children and young people.On behalf of the BPA TrusteesDoug Lee
Labels:
Adventure Playground,
Brent Council,
chidlren,
Housing Action Trust,
Stonebridge HAT,
Stonebridge Primary School
Does Michaela's 'private school ethos' mean they can ignore safety concerns as enquiries blocked?
The only street entry/exit from Michaela Free school Photo: Nick Wright (via Facebook) |
This is the sequence of events as recorded by email:
September 30th by email.
Dear Ms Birbalsingh,
I am writing to you in my
capacity as Brent NUT Health & Safety Adviser and London
representative on the National NUT Health & Safety Working Group as a
result of concerns that have been expressed to me regarding fire safety
procedures in your school.
NUT members have
expressed concern that there appears to be only one entrance and exit
from the building, through the wooden hoardings on the building site and
that there appears to be no area for fire assembly purposes. This is a
concern to the NUT for two reasons: potential danger for NUT members who
may be working at the school and potential danger for the pupils.
To
reassure us over these concerns, could you please send me a copy of
your fire risk assessment? I am requesting this document under the
provisions of the "Safety Representatives and Safety Committees
regulations 1977", specifically regulation 7 which allows for inspection
of documents and provision of information necessary to enable me to
carry out my function. As an appointed Brent NUT Safety rep, part of my
function is to promote health and safety in Brent schools on behalf of
members that may be employed in those schools.
Hopefully
I will be reassured by the fire risk assessment that everything is in
place and that members' concerns have been unfounded. However, if I do
not get sight of this document or a reply to this request, I will be
forced to take this concern elsewhere.
Thank you for your help,
Jenny Cooper,
Brent NUT Health & Safety Adviser
London rep on national NUT HSWG
NUT Safety rep on Brent Schools' Health & Safety Committee
No response was received so follow up email on October 16th:
Dear Ms Birbalsingh,
Your message can't be delivered because delivery to this address is restricted to authenticated Sender.
For more information about this issue see DSN code 5.7.12 in Exchange Online.
Do you have a response to my earlier email, below?
I will be actioning this matter in another way if I do not hear from you within the week.
Jenny Cooper
Response from Michaela
officeadmin@mcsbrent.co.ukYour message can't be delivered because delivery to this address is restricted to authenticated Sender.
For more information about this issue see DSN code 5.7.12 in Exchange Online.
This is the same Michaela email address as Jenny had used before in communicating with the school and has not been rejected before. It appears that she has been blocked from raising these legitimate concerns.
Brent NUT told me:
We have been leafleting the parents about the H&S issues at Michaela. We leafleted the parents meetings for the new intake. When we were handing out letters to children at the end of the day to take home to all parents, some staff came out and asked why we hadn't written to ask about the situation with regards to fire safety and other issues. We replied that the H&S Advisor Jenny Cooper had written but there had been no response. That is why we were handing out letters as we were so concerned. This took the wind out of sails somewhat. We alerted Ruth Moher, Lead member for Education that we had not had any response and she is checking what is happening. A Brent Council H&S Officer is supposed to making a visit to the school and may already have done. Interesting that now Jenny has been blocked.
Labels:
Brent Council,
fire,
free school,
Katharine Birbalsingh,
Michaela Secondary School,
NUT,
private school,
safety
Thursday, 16 October 2014
Caroline Lucas ensures powerful teacher voices are heard in Parliament
It is unusual these days to have speeches in Parliament fully reported. Today I am making an exception because I feel the issues raised by Caroline Lucas in her adjournment debate on education on Tuesday were so important. Please do read on after the text break.
This evening I want to pay tribute to the incredible work being done in schools in Brighton and Hove. Last year the city’s young people got their best ever GSCE results. This year the key stage 2 results were in the top quarter in the country and 54% of A-level students got A* to B grades, an improvement in results for the third year running. Brighton and Hove was also named top local authority in the country for tackling homophobia in schools. That really is a track record to be proud of, so I want to applaud the many teachers and other staff who make such achievements possible.
However, those achievements have been reached in spite of Government policy, not because of it. Research from the National Union of Teachers reveals the extent to which Ministers have been taking teachers for granted. The NUT found that 87% of teachers said that they know one or more teachers who have left the profession because of work load; that 90% of teachers have themselves considered leaving the profession because of work load; and that 96% said their work load has had negative consequences for their family or personal life.
Tonight I want to do two things: first, to share some of what I have been told by local teachers about the daily reality behind those statistics, and to ask the Department of Education and the Secretary of State to start listening to teachers and to review their current policies; and secondly, to make the case for statutory PSHE—personal, social, health and economic education—teaching in all state-funded schools. I have a private Member’s Bill before the House designed to achieve exactly that. I very much welcome the Minister’s views on that proposal.
This evening I want to pay tribute to the incredible work being done in schools in Brighton and Hove. Last year the city’s young people got their best ever GSCE results. This year the key stage 2 results were in the top quarter in the country and 54% of A-level students got A* to B grades, an improvement in results for the third year running. Brighton and Hove was also named top local authority in the country for tackling homophobia in schools. That really is a track record to be proud of, so I want to applaud the many teachers and other staff who make such achievements possible.
However, those achievements have been reached in spite of Government policy, not because of it. Research from the National Union of Teachers reveals the extent to which Ministers have been taking teachers for granted. The NUT found that 87% of teachers said that they know one or more teachers who have left the profession because of work load; that 90% of teachers have themselves considered leaving the profession because of work load; and that 96% said their work load has had negative consequences for their family or personal life.
Tonight I want to do two things: first, to share some of what I have been told by local teachers about the daily reality behind those statistics, and to ask the Department of Education and the Secretary of State to start listening to teachers and to review their current policies; and secondly, to make the case for statutory PSHE—personal, social, health and economic education—teaching in all state-funded schools. I have a private Member’s Bill before the House designed to achieve exactly that. I very much welcome the Minister’s views on that proposal.
Wednesday, 15 October 2014
Housing for People NOT Profit: Greens at MIPIM Protest Today
There were plenty of people from Brent at the developers' MIPIM jamboree at Olympia today, where deals are hatchd between councils and developers resulting in social cleansing on an epic scale.
Some Labour councils boycotted the fair and others, such as Hammermsith and Fulham, where a stall had been booked by the previous adminstration, used it to make the case for council housing.
Andy Donald from Brent usually takes part, and in fact has been feted by MIPIM.
This morning Gaynor Lloyd from Brent was one of those who spotted Boris Johnson slipping into the Exhibitions. She emailed me to say
I got to shout at Boris! Saw him scuttling in at the back, being interviewed - appropriately - in a back passage and as he retreated with the odd minders I broke the habits of a lifetime. I shouted "Why didn't you go in at the front?" He looked a lot less puffed up than normal...
Labels:
Boris Johnson,
Brent,
Darren Johnson,
green party,
Johnathan Bartley,
Lambeth,
Lewisham,
Martin Francis,
MIPIM,
Olympia,
protest
Tuesday, 14 October 2014
Ex Brent Council manager slams decision to appeal Employment Tribunal Judgment and failure to order independent investigation
Christine Collins, who used to be Community Engagement Manager at Brent Council, took to a Soapbox at Wembley Connects tonight to lambast the Council's decision to appeal over the recent Employment Tribunal case and its failure to appoint an independent investigator to review the workings of the Human Resources Department.
Collins told the audience that they may recognise her (she used to be the officer facilitating such events) but that she was now speaking in a personal capacity.
She said that she wanted to talk about the Employment Tribunal findings in a case against the Council which found that:
She explained that in the summer she was proud to stand side by side with Brent councillors in Cricklewood to stop a group of racists and fascists from ;marching through our streets to divide our community.'
'Imagine my disappointment,' she went on, ' to learn how these same councillors have reacted to the Employment Tribunal findings.'
Collins said that she had expected a council committed to fighting racism and supporting diversity in its employment practices, to be horrified by the findings, sympathetic to the member of staff who was treated so appallingly and anxious to ensure that the climate of fear and bullying was fully and independently investigated.
Instead the council had decided to appeal the decision which would put the staff member through further stress and anxiety. In addition they had decided to appoint 'one of their own to investigate.'
Pausing to look up from her speech and addressing the councillors and residents assembled at Patidar House she said:
Challenged by residents with cries of 'nonsense' he became increasingly angry and stumbled over his words. Directly asked if he would order an independent investigation he said 'No' and claimed that Michael Pavey's review would hear from staff and independent consultants.
The audience reacted with derision and calls of 'shame'.
Collins told the audience that they may recognise her (she used to be the officer facilitating such events) but that she was now speaking in a personal capacity.
She said that she wanted to talk about the Employment Tribunal findings in a case against the Council which found that:
- a black staff member was directly discriminated against on the protected characteristics of race
- the claimant suffered victimisation
- the claimant was constructively dismissed
She explained that in the summer she was proud to stand side by side with Brent councillors in Cricklewood to stop a group of racists and fascists from ;marching through our streets to divide our community.'
'Imagine my disappointment,' she went on, ' to learn how these same councillors have reacted to the Employment Tribunal findings.'
Collins said that she had expected a council committed to fighting racism and supporting diversity in its employment practices, to be horrified by the findings, sympathetic to the member of staff who was treated so appallingly and anxious to ensure that the climate of fear and bullying was fully and independently investigated.
Instead the council had decided to appeal the decision which would put the staff member through further stress and anxiety. In addition they had decided to appoint 'one of their own to investigate.'
Pausing to look up from her speech and addressing the councillors and residents assembled at Patidar House she said:
'I say "Shame on you Brent Council!"'Concluding her speech Christine Collins called on Brent councillors to accept the Tribunal findings and have a totally independent review of the conduct of Human Resources in Brent Council:
They are happy to take on large numbers of external consultants to carry out reviews of all kinds of things - why not this? If they are so convinced there is nothing seriously wrong, what have they got to hide?Brent Council leader Cllr Muhammed Butt arrived late to the forum but asked to comment on the Employment Tribunal by Cllr Krupa Sheth, chair of Wembley Connects, said that the council had to 'undertake due process' in making the appeal and that 'both sides have to be heard',
Challenged by residents with cries of 'nonsense' he became increasingly angry and stumbled over his words. Directly asked if he would order an independent investigation he said 'No' and claimed that Michael Pavey's review would hear from staff and independent consultants.
The audience reacted with derision and calls of 'shame'.
Labels:
Brent Council,
bullying,
Christine Collins,
employment,
Employment Tribunal,
Human Resources,
racism,
victimisation,
Wembley Connects
ONLY 2 DAYS LEFT TO NOMINATE ROSEMARIE CLARKE
Brent
Council resorting to dirty tricks as embarrassment looms?
Guest blog by E.Tribunal
The prospect of seeing
Rosemarie Clarke being presented with the Brent Staff Achievement Award
2014 by her colleagues Cara Davani and Christine Gilbert is one which has moved a large number of
people to register their knowledge and appreciation of this strong and resolute
lady by nominating her here LINK
It’s crucial that this momentum is kept up in the last 2
days before nominations close, however. So could I ask everyone who hasn’t
already done so to nominate Rosemarie and for as many people as possible to
urge others to nominate her before the deadline of October 16th?
We need the maximum nomination for Rosemarie as we can
expect some dirty tricks from Butt/Gilbert/Davani/Ledden as they attempt to wriggle out of the
inevitable popular result. Following the example of Jed Bush ( Bush’s brother in Florida who fiddled the vote to
make him president), they may claim that only either ‘Rosemarie’ with an ‘ie’
or with a ‘y’ should count.
Nonsense. We know and they know
who we’re nominating.
They may claim that she resigned from Brent Council and is
no longer eligible. Nonsense. As the Tribunal judge established, their
bullying, victimisation and racial discrimination amounted to constructive
dismissal, so their illegal treatment of Rosemarie forced her resignation. ( A
point they inadvertently acknowledged by insisting on continuing their
disciplinary even after forcing her resignation).
There are rumours that they have organised a
counter-campaign by selecting their own nominee and getting people to vote for
him/her in order to outvote Rosemarie.
This is always possible. It’s also possible, I suppose, that the nominee
they’ve chosen to select is Ms Davani herself. Could it be (see Martin’s post
today) that this is why it’s been announced that she is now actually on the
Brent payroll, in order to make her eligible?
Will they be able to find enough people to support their
plan? Or is Brent Council about to
receive hundreds of nomination forms for Ms Davani with only a paw-mark where
the nominator’s name should be?
Will it be noticed that the majority of these votes come
from the same addresses, addresses which do not tally with the official
register of the names of dogs residing at that address and where the actual
resident mutt has no knowledge that
their identity has been fraudulently used?
Will the police again
show no interest in getting involved in a blatant case of identity theft
?
Whatever the truth, we can all be confident that Wembley Matters will get it to us first.
Whatever the truth, we can all be confident that Wembley Matters will get it to us first.
MEANWHILE, PLEASE
NOMINATE ROSEMARIE AND DO ALL YOU CAN TO CONVINCE OTHERS TO DO THE SAME
Labels:
Brent Council,
Brent Staff Achievement Award,
Cara Davani,
Rosemarie Clarke,
Rosemary Clarke
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)