The Queen's Parade development in Willesden Green returns to the Brent Planning Committee on Wednesday having been deferred on March 14th. However, the developer has not given full details of their proposed reduction in the height of the building and this may mean further deferral.
The Planning Officers' report LINK seeks to ride two horses in continuing to advocate approval, despite the lack of information, but also providing reasons why the application could be refused - rather confusing.:
Extracts:
When considering the suggested changes, while
the precise level of decrease in the height of the building has not been set
out by the applicant, the changes may be sufficient to overcome the Members’
concerns. However, the amendments would need to be worked up by the applicant
and the daylight analysis re-cast for the revised scheme. As such, it is not
possible to present these suggested revised proposals to this planning committee
meeting. Is it (sic) therefore recommended that the application is deferred to a
subsequent planning committee meeting to allow the receipt of the revised
proposals and supporting information and the re-consultation of neighbouring
residents.
However, should members wish to determine the
application at this planning committee, Officers continue to recommend that
planning permission is granted. Although there are areas where the proposed
development would not entirely comply with guidance, when considered on balance
the benefits of the scheme would outweigh the negative aspects of the
application.
Members
can however choose what weight they consider should be given to the material
planning considerations within the proposal and therefore could come to a
different conclusion on these matters if they do not agree with the
recommendation. The matters that members have expressed concern about have been
discussed in this report.
The report concludes
As
discussed above, officers continue to recommend that planning permission is
granted for the development as currently proposed. However, given that members
have specified that they are minded to refuse planning consent, the applicant
have requested the ability to amend the proposal as set out above (reductions
in height to address outlook and daylight concerns and the provision of
additional communal student facilities) and to provide further detail regarding
the arrangements for student drop-off and pick up, within a student management
plan.
It is therefore recommended that the
application is deferred to a subsequent planning committee meeting to allow the
amendments and information to be submitted and for further consultation to be
undertaken in relation to those amendments.
However, if
members consider that the application should be refused in its current form the
following reasons for refusal are suggested based on the issues raised by
members at the previous meeting.
.
1.
The
proposed development, by reason of its size and siting, would have an unduly
detrimental impact on the amenities of the occupiers of the adjoining building,
Electric House, by way of an unduly detrimental loss of light to and outlook
from the windows of three residential units within that building. This is
contrary to policy DMP1 of the Brent Local Plan Development Management Policies
2016 and Supplementary Planning Guidance 17;
2.
The
proposed development, by reason of failure to incorporate communal facilities
appropriate to the use, would represent the provision of a poor standard of
accommodation for future occupants, contrary to policy DMP20 of the Brent Local
Plan Development Management Policies 2016.
3.
The
proposal, by reason of the failure to demonstrate adequate arrangements for the
servicing of the building during student move-in and move-out periods, and
having regard to the busy nature of the adjoining highway, is likely to result
in conditions prejudicial to the free and safe flow of traffic on the
surrounding highway network. This is contrary to Policies DMP1 and DMP12 of the
Brent Local Plan Development Management Policies 2016.
