Showing posts with label Dudden Hill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dudden Hill. Show all posts

Wednesday, 4 December 2024

Overview of CNWL Dudden Hill Planning Application to be decided next Wednesday

 


 
 CNWL Dudden Hill Phase 1 development building heights in storeys
 
As stated in yesterday's article on the College of North West London (CNWL) Wembley Park site that and the CNWL  Dudden Hill site are separate items on the December 11th Planning Committee Agenda they are conjoined as both site sales contribute to the cost of the new CNWL building in Wembley Park that will eventually house both campuses.

The Dudden Hill site currently consists of a variety of buildings that are claimed to be no longer fit for purpose. They do, of course ,sit on a large site which is a redevelopment gold mine.


Bottom left College Green at the junction of Dudden Hill and Denzil Road. Above it is the College site and to the right, either side of the railway line is a SINC (Site of importance for nature conservation). Originally the plan was to build on the Green but its improvement is now part of the plan.

The development of the site will take place in 2 phases.


Phase 1 is to the right (East) of the red dotted line. To the extreme left of the image is an estate of two storey houses  on Selbie Road that (at the moment) are not part of the redevelopment zone.

The tallest buildings (C,D and E) are alongside the railway line, mid-height (11 to 17 storeys) in the centre of the Phase 1 development. The lowest (4 or 5 storeys) are  along Denzil Road with a small park separating them from Phase 1 and opening on to Denzil Road. There are courtyards within each cluster in both phases.

It is Phase 1 in detail that is going to Planning Committee and Phase 2 is in outline and subject to change.

The timetable covers 10 years from this Planning Committee Meeting:

May 2025 Phase 1 college buildings are vacated and staff and activities decanted to Phase 2 buildings.

Summer 2025 Demolition of Phase 1 collrge buildings and construction begins
 
2027-2032 Phase 1 housing completed
 
September 2028 completion of new CNWL facility on Olympic Way
 
September 2028 vacant possession of Phase 2 buildings secured as staff and students move to Olympic Way.
 
September 2028 demolitionof Phase 2 buildings  and new build commences 

November 2034 Phase 2 completed

 

Hill Group in their planning statement say:

Phase 1 comprises 1,076 homes across 11 buildings/blocks ranging from 4 to 28 storeys. These are:

• Building C is 24 storeys with a 20-storey shoulder and provides 187 apartments for traditional sale/rent;

• Building D is 28 storeys with a 24-storey shoulder and provides 223 build-to-rent apartments;

• Building E is 22 storeys with 18 and 10-storey shoulders and provides 196 build-to- rent apartments;

• Buildings F and G are 11 storeys each and provide 162 apartments for traditional sale/rent;

• Buildings H, J and K are 15, 17 and 11 storeys respectively and provide 239 apartments for traditional sale/rent; and

• Buildings V, W, and Y are 4-5 storeys and provide 69 affordable apartments all of which (100%) are offered at social rent.

 

Phase 1 has been designed to be the focus of the commercial uses at ground floor where the majority of homes and taller buildings are located. This part of the development is the most likely arrival point from Dollis Hill station, bus stops, and Willesden town centre, and it is prominently located with regards to passing trade along Dudden Hill Lane.

Accordingly, a precise and tailored commercial offering is proposed for Phase 1. Key elements of this include the anchor facilities of a food store and food & beverage premises located either side of the main gateway to the Site from Dudden Hill Lane. Flexible retail units (which could be small shops, restaurants, or cafes) are positioned a little deeper into the development along the east-west route, and on the corner of the neighbourhood park/Denzil Road; where they will still benefit from a good level of passing trade

They are at pains to point out that these shops are a local offer and not designed to compete with high street retail. 

A nursery is proposed that if no provider came forward could be replaced by a community facility:

The nursery size and location is also robustly secured in the Development Specification and Parameter plans. It is proposed to be located at the lower density part of the development on the corner of Denzil Road and Selbie Avenue, where it has the opportunity of taking some of the available defensible green space as a private garden for play. In the event that a commercial nursery operator cannot be found, this unit would instead come forward as an alternative form of social/community infrastructure e.g. opticians, dentist, post-office etc within Use Class E or F. It is worth noting that in the likely event that a nursery operator is forthcoming, these other forms of social/community infrastructure could still and likely will come forward within the other flexible Class E floorspace across either base.

The financial viability assessment (FVA) concluded that the overall development would make and this would mean no affordable housing. However an 18% 'affordable' element was negotiated but only a small proportion is council housing and the intermediate level shared ownership:

As a general principle, Phase 2 includes a higher proportion of family housing than Phase 1. This reflects the typology of buildings within the respective phases and the locations most suitable for family homes. Phase 1 includes the taller buildings along the trainline, together with the majority of the retail, commerce, and workspace. It will create the densest and most vibrant part of the new neighbourhood. Phase 2 comprises lower-scale buildings set amongst generous green space that better lends itself for a greater quantum of family homes (and indeed the nursery and community centre). Taller, thinner buildings are naturally more suited to smaller units orientated around a central core, whilst lower, wider and longer buildings lend themselves more easily to larger family homes.

 

In addition, Phase 1 is the first phase of a regeneration scheme for which first-time buyers are the target market initially (given the very high demand). The cost of a smaller 1 or 2 bedroom unit is more attractive and affordable to this market. Phase 1 also includes build-to-rent tenures (which lend themselves to young professionals and new families) are proposed in the taller blocks. This approach is supported by London Plan policy H10 acknowledges that a higher proportion of one and two bed units are generally more appropriate in more urban locations closer to stations and town centres. The proposed mix for Phase 1 assists with the viability and deliverability of an important regeneration scheme and ability to facilitate the relocation of the CNWL.

 

All of the affordable housing proposed for Phase 1 is provided as either shared ownership or social rent, which is understood to have a greater local need than Discount Market Rent products. The Applicant has undertaken initial discussions with potential Registered Providers to ensure there is strong interest and the product and building align with market expectations. The location and product of the Affordable Housing has been carefully considered to ensure its suitable and desirable by the eventual Registered Provider.

So families needing social housing will have to wait for the second phase that starts in 2028 and is completed in 2034 - market conditions and financial viability may change the tenure. As in the Wembley Park officers' report, affordability is measured by habital room, rather than housing unit. The gives a higher percentage figure for larger properties.

It has proved to find amongst the documents any image of the whole development but the screen grabs below should give you  some idea:

Lower rise buildings along Denzil Road


Buildings at the back of College Green (junction of Denzil Road and Dudden Hill Lane)


Junction of Cooper Road and Dudden Hill


Tall building E and  lower building F looking west along Cooper Road


Looking south from the petrol station across the railway line - the new flats on the ex-plant nursery site appear to be missing.


Visible from a slightly different angle


View from arrival square along the new east - west route

 

 Hill Group summarise their case:

 

Social

 

✓ Delivery of approximately 1,934 high quality new homes across this Site (c. 1,627) and Crescent House, Wembley (307), akin to 84% of LBB’s annual London Plan requirement.

✓ Provision of 20% (by habitable room) affordable housing across the two Sites, significantly exceeding the maximum viable amount.

✓ Provision of the following at College Green alone:

o Circa 1,627 homes.

o Circa 236 family homes, including 4-bed properties.

o 18% affordable housing (by habitable room), up to 50% (123 units) of which are affordable family homes.

o A wide variety of sizes and tenures, all of which are high quality homes that balance fire regulations, dual aspect, outlook, daylight, and thermal comfort and efficiency.

✓ Delivery of a multi-use community centre suitable for indoor sports, leisure activities and community events.

✓ Provision for a new nursery and/or similar social infrastructure.

✓ Provision of local amenities including convenience store, food and beverage premises, gym, and Build to Rent lounges.

✓ Provision of flexible workspace with potential for ‘maker space’.

✓ At least 1.45 hectares of new and enhanced green space, including:

o c. 0.29 hectare of retained and enhanced public open space (on Selbie Avenue and Dudden Hill Lane).

o c. 0.38 hectare new publicly-accessible neighbourhood park.

o c. 0.78 hectare of communal courtyards and podium/roof terraces for tenants.

✓ Fully policy-compliant play space provision on Site for all ages.

 

Environmental

 

✓ Landscape design ethos around women and children’s (physical and perceived) safety, achieving safer pedestrian connections and through-routes.

✓ Landscape-led development with integrated sustainable drainage strategy, planting of over 350 new trees, achieving an exceptionally high Urban Greening Factor score of 0.57. This is almost 50% over the policy target and would be one of if not the greenest developments proposed in Brent to date.

✓ A sensitive landscape response to the adjacent railway SINC.

✓ Hill to act as long term stewards of the development, managing the landscape and public realm to a high standard.

✓ Local townscape and streetscape benefits (and no heritage harm).

✓ All electric energy strategy, with glazing optimised to balance daylight with overheating.

✓ Operational carbon reduction of over 80% beyond Part L 2021; far surpassing the policy minimum target of 35 % and reflects the detailed consideration to sustainability in the project design. This will minimise energy bills for residents with 25% achieved through lean measures that reduce actual energy use.

✓ Non-residential units to meet BREEAM ‘Excellent’.

✓ Responsible sourcing of construction materials.

✓ Car-free development, except blue-badge parking and car-club spaces. Overall net reduction in parking and vehicle trips compared to existing college, bringing air quality and transport network benefits.

✓ Upgraded Dudden Hill Lane / Cooper Road junction including new pedestrian and cycle crossing point, improving access to Dollis Hill Station.

✓ Pavement widening on Denzil Road.

✓ Air Quality Positive development.

 

Thjere are only two resident comments on the Brent Council Planning Portal - both neutral.

 

https://pa.brent.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=neighbourComments&keyVal=DCAPR_169398

 

Looking at the overall context it is worth remembering the scheme for Neasden Goods Yard, not far away, where most of the proposed towers are higher than the highest on the CNWL site at 30, 40, 42, 43 and 51 storeys. LINK
 

 

Tuesday, 3 December 2024

Wembley Park planning application to build 31 storey and 18 storey building on Olympic Way college site to be heard at Planning Committee next week

 

The new buildings from Bobby Moore Bridge (Bridge Road opposite station)

The College of North West London building that will be demolished

 

 In 2017 I predicted that the merger of the College of North West London and City of Westminster College as United  Colleges would lead to deals involving their property portfolio but I rather underestimated the extent of change that this would involve. Will property deals follow CNWL and CWC merger?

In Brent the plan involve the sale of both College of North West London College sites (Wembley Park's Crescent House and Dudden Hill's College Park) for housing development with  the profit funding a new college building on Olympic Way/Fulton Road. This was  given planning permission in July 2023 on the site of the Olympic Office Centre, formerly the HQ of Network Housing.

 

New Wembley Park Campus building

Brent Council was involved via a loan given to United Colleges to help set up the deal. CNWL has already sold its Kilburn site and sold its other Wembley Park building to the Education Funding Agency to provide accommodation for Michaela School.

If your head is spinning perhaps this explanation from Brent Planning Officers will help:

Officers have carefully weighed up the conclusions drawn by the viability assessment and the policy requirement for the delivery the new college facility in order to enable the release these two sites for development. Officers also have attached weight to the benefits associated with the delivery of the new college. Officers consider that the inter-relationship between these two schemes and the delivery of the new college facility is material to the consideration of this application, and a Section 106 obligation will prevent the implementation of these two applications unless the construction of the new College building is going ahead.

 

It is therefore considered reasonable and appropriate for the Council to place weight on the financial contribution that the sale of these two sites will make towards the delivery of the new college building and officers have also evaluated the scheme on this basis. However, it is for the decision maker to determine what weight should be applied to the facilitating role that the sale of these sites play in the delivery of the new college facility.

 

Officers consider that this should be given substantial weight given that the new college facility cannot be delivered without the sale of these sites to the College, not only for financial reasons (as the sale is required to fund the college) but also for planning policy and legal reasons (as Section 106 obligations will prevent the implementation of these two applications, if approved, unless the new college facility is going ahead).

This is rather a lot of pressure on Planning Committee to agree the application, particularly as Brent Council helped facilitate the deal.

The impact of the 18 and 31 storey building on the views from Wembley Park Station and Bridge Road is enormous. It will loom in front of the more distant views along Olympic Way to the stadium as well as from vehicles travelling between Wembley Central and Wembley Park.


 

 The problem will the piecemeal approval of the various Wembley Park applications is that the wider context is not always evident. For example the view below doesn't show the tower blocks under construction at Wembley Park station  along Brook Road, opposite the proposed buildings. In the illustration you can barely see the station itself.

 

The pink buildings in the illustrations are buildings in the pipeline for the approved Fulton Quarter. This the area behind the college building made up of the Stadium Retail Park, McDonalds and the Troubadour Theatre. LINK

The Fulton Quarter will provide 995 homes.

I have tried to show the overall impact by roughly placing the two towers in context below. The numbers refer to the number of storeys in each block.

 


 The viability assessment referred to in the officers' remarks is about how much affordable housing can be supplied and still give the developer a return. The officers make the figures at Wembley Park more palatable by combining the two ex-college sites:

The affordable units classed as intermediate by officers are shared ownership. Not affordable for most Brent residents and the Council itself is aware of the product's shortcomings. See LINK.
 

It is surprising given the magnitude of this application that the Brent Planning Portal LINK states only 6 comments have been received. The only comment actually shown is from Ilford:

I object to this planning application for these two buildings of 18 and 31 storeys in height for various social, environmental, public health and fire safety reasons. For example Wembley has now seen more than enough high density housing schemes in recent years that has put an overall strain on local social infrastructure. Also the townscape has been greatly changed which has had an inevitable effect upon local heritage around here too. This particular housing scheme is also being funded by a private building firm so therefore these flats are highly unlikely to be genuinely affordable to local residents. Fire safety has to be another major consideration in planning terms especially with the tower block fires that we have seen across Greater London in recent years as well.

The application for the Dudden Hill College Green CNWL site will also be heard at the Planning Committee next week, December 11th. I will review that later. LINK

 

Wednesday, 19 October 2022

First consultation on massive redevelopment of the Dudden Hill College of North West London site on zoom tonight and tomorrow at the college 3pm-7.30pm

 

 

The Hill Group will be holding public consultation events for the proposed College Green scheme on Thursday 20 October from 3pm to 7.30pm and Saturday 22 October from 11am to 2pm. These will take place at College of North West London Willesden Campus, Denzil Road, London NW10 2XD. They will also be holding a public consultation webinar event on Wednesday 19 October at 7pm. The link to register for the webinar is:
https://fourcommunications.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_tBBYKv8mS2KTKHQMIQs1jg 

 

 Wembley Matters has covered these plans since 2019 and the college's merger with Westminster College came rise to speculation over selling off of some property. Current plans are for CNWL to move to a new site in Wembley Park, with the Dudden Hill site and the current Wembley Park site redeveloped. The site is part of the Neasden Stations Growth Area Draft Masterplan LINK.

 

An old view of the college and College Green

 

The development is site 3 of the Neasden Growth Area Masterplan


 Artist's image (right) of the development from Masterplan


 From the Draft Masterplan - contrast with Hill Group's description for the consultation (top of page) including increase in homes from 1,100 to 1,500 and dropping of 'affordable' description.

 


Artist's impression of the development 

 

 

 

Saturday, 12 June 2021

Brent Council's Utopian plans for Neasden at Cabinet on Monday

 

Brent Council's Cabinet will decide on Monday to go out to consultation on far-reaching plans for the Neasden Stations Growth Area (NSGA) Draft Masterplan.

The Masterpan envisages the long-term transformation of the often derided (particularly by Private Eye LINK) area with co-location (housing and industrial/commercial) development on 5 sites including that of the College of North West London on Dudden Hill. There will be a total of 2,338 new homes plus commercial and light industrial spaces.

"This Masterplan Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) seeks to unlock the massive potential that the Neasden Stations Growth Area (NSGA) has to offer, and define a new place for the post-pandemic world that balances local choices within the wider metropolitan context. The delivery of new workspace, improved accessibility to the wider area, an interconnected network of green open spaces, enhanced public realm and a permeable movement network will create an inclusive neighbourhood that can support at least 2,000 new homes, and also serve as a distinctive gateway to Neasden. This Masterplan SPD sets out the overarching vision for NSGA, and the underpinning urban design framework, to help ensure that the transformation of the existing poor quality environment brings forward physical, social and economic regeneration for all the community."

At times the Masterplan is almost Utopian in its vision:


"A diverse Neasden will be a place that is used and enjoyed by all people, irrespective of gender, age, ethnicity, physical ability, sexual orientation or social background. The natural and built environment will be fairer and more inclusive, reflecting best practice through design to ensure the area is welcoming, responsive, intuitive, flexible, varied and convenient.

With around 25% of the local population aged under 18, Neasden will represent the needs of children and young people, and reflect London’s status as an increasingly youthful city. Children and young people will be able to access social and physical infrastructure and move around the area safely, independently, and without adult supervision, benefitting their physical, social and mental development and health.

Development at Neasden will be child-friendly, maximising opportunities for safe play and outdoor activities. Open spaces will support formal and informal play, exercise and rest, and be accessible to all with no segregation. Open spaces will be well-overlooked by homes and other active uses to ensure they are welcoming and benefit from natural surveillance, overcoming crime and the fear of crime.

With around 55% of the local population identifying as belonging to Black, Asian or minority ethnic groups, Neasden will represent both the needs and cultures of all people. Protected groups will be considered from the outset and given a greater participatory role in shaping how the area evolves through meaningful stakeholder engagement.

Development at Neasden will support different modes of living, catering for multi-generational households, young families, and over 60s, alongside a range of different domestic cultures. Buildings and landscapes will be as much for local people as for new residents, allowing the establishment of a mixed and balanced community that reflects the diversity of the area."

 

The summary for the preferred option is rather more down to earth:

Option 3 proposes vertical stacking of residential uses on podium floors with industrial below and some commercial/retail fronting Neasden Lane is proposed on Site 1 (LSIS) and Site 2 (LSIS). On site 3 (CNWL), proposes predominantly residential development with some commercial/ retail/community uses and retention of the existing housing estate adjacent. On Site 4 (LSIS), vertical co-location of residential uses with industrial uses is proposed. On Site 5, predominantly residential use with some light industrial use is proposed. Site 6 is proposed to be retained as existing and is deemed unviable for development.

The Masterplan is long-term. In Option 3 the estate next to the College of North West London (Severn Way and Selbie Avenue) is not down for redevelopment but it is within the development area and could come forward at a later stage. It does look rather vulnerable in the illustration between the two masses of tower blocks. A further possibility is a new station in the area on the potential West London Orbital line.

The existing green space beside the college at the foot of Dudden Hill/Denzil Road appears unlikely to be retained but instead space will be integrated into the new housing.

Details for each site:

 The 5 Sites

 




It is a huge document and the Cabinet is unlikely to discuss it in any great detail. I have uploaded it on One Drive for readers who wish to read further. Click on the bottom right square for full size version.


Wednesday, 13 January 2021

UPDATED: Details of the 'significant changes' in Dudden Hill/Willesden High Road application which led to deferral

 

Matt Kelcher, Chair of Brent Planning Committee, announced that the planning application for the very large development between Dudden Hill and High Road, Willesden, would not be taken at tonight's meeting.

The reason given was that the developer had submitted 'significant' late changes to the application, presumably to address the reasons planning officers had given for, unusually in Brent, recommending refusal of the applciation LINK.

Sceptics on social media had already suggested that 'the developer will be back with a few changes and then the planners and committee will back it.'

It may come back as early a next month when officers have had a chance to assess it and committee members have had time to review revised documentation.

Let's wait and see if the sceptics are right.

UPDATE 

Philip Grant sent the comment below which tells us much more:

think that the answer to what the 'significant late changes' were for application 18/3498 is contained in the supplementary report to the Planning Committee meeting (main text "copy and pasted" below for information).

Instead of changing the affordable housing offer for their own scheme, the developers are offering to pay the Council £1.5m, to build affordable rented accommodation somewhere else in the borough!

The current shortfall on "affordable rent" in their scheme is 13 homes. Would £1.5m cover the cost of building that many new Council homes?

Following this 'significant change', will Planning Officers now recommend the application for approval? I wouldn't bet against it!

SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT:-

'Revised Affordable Housing Offer:

At the time of writing the Officers Committee Report, the formal offer proposed by the applicant was for 66% affordable housing on a non-policy compliant split, weighted in favour of Shared Ownership homes. The Officers Report outlines that the proposed affordable housing offer is unacceptable as it over delivers Shared Ownership homes at the expense of 13 London Affordable Rented homes, which would meet the most acute needs of the borough.

Since the publication of the report, the applicant has proposed a payment of £1.5 million to be used toward the provision of off-site affordable housing to mitigate the under-provision of London Affordable Rented (LAR) homes. This would be in addition to the 66% affordable housing discussed in the main report.

Revised Retail Parking Arrangements:  

The officers committee report also raises concerns with the quantum of retail parking without an appropriate parking price regime to encourage non car access and regarding the under-provision of residential blue-badge parking.

Since the publication of the agenda, the applicant has agreed “To enter into a retail car park management plan with the council and a space re-allocation plan allocating up to 10 retail parking spaces to disabled parking spaces”. This would allow for a strategy for parking management to be agreed with the applicant.

Application to be deferred:

 
Officers recommend that this application is deferred to allow the report to be updated to reflect and consider the revised offer and arrangements