The Brent Cross Coalition has  welcomed the collapse of what they call  'the grotesque, car-based Brent  Cross scheme'. However. they say it is totally unacceptable to still go ahead  with the 'easy-profit shopping centre expansion', which they have been told  told is a 'possibility'. Neighbouring Brent Council fought this successfully in  the late 1990s, and is likely to again. 
The Coalition for a Sustainable Brent Cross-Cricklewood Plan say:
 
 The Coalition for a Sustainable Brent Cross-Cricklewood Plan say:
We demand the whole plan is scrapped, and the arrogant local developers,  and their ineffective PR company, are removed from the project.
 Measures in the new Localism Act mean that over-bearing property  companies, in alliance with the conceited Barnet Council, cannot get  away with “business as usual”. This is a great day for people-power –  not Hammerson plc and not Mike Freer (former Barnet leader, now MP).
 We want development based on people’s aspirations for a sustainable,  low-carbon, exciting regeneration of the area. This means starting from  scratch, and will also obviously have to wait for improvements in the  economy.
 The developers have wasted many years – not ONE home has been built, not  ONE transport improvement. Barnet Council has also wasted many hours of  work in promoting something nobody wanted -  their web site still  estimates 29,000 extra cars every day in the Brent Cross area, which  would cause traffic misery. 
 The developers have just received planning permission for a small  building at Brent Cross – but have resorted to making the application  from a tax haven in the Channel Islands. They have no shame, and are  behaving no better than bankers.
 Lia Colacicco, Co-ordinator of the Brent Cross Coalition, said:
 “The regeneration was always a mirage; despite the PR spin, the  developers were only ever committed to building a few hundred new  housing units anyway. In return for cheaply purchasing large swathes of  public land, their main return to the local population would have been  gridlocked traffic.  I hope the next deal is more transparent, and  involves a stretch of light rail to link to local tube lines.”
 Alison Hopkins, Dollis Hill resident, said:
 “What we are being offered now is little different from the rejected  shopping centre planning application of 13 years ago. We will still get  lots of extra traffic, but no transport improvements. The developers  want to 'pick the low-hanging fruit' of what pays out quick profits. The  Brent Cross Waste Incinerator seems to be a dead project now, but we  will continue to campaign, to make absolutely sure.” 
 David Howard, Chair of the Federation of Residents Associations of Barnet, said:
 “The Brent Cross Cricklewood development would have had a negative  impact on the infrastructure and the environment of much of North London  and for generations to come. Brian Coleman cannot quote my phrase of  “hobbit homes”, since he has done nothing to stop the scheme, and we  have. We need the public land at Brent Cross to be kept out of the hands  of the developers, and corridors across it reserved for future light  railway to Brent Cross Northern Line station, and to other local areas.”
 Councillor Shafique Choudhary, London Borough of Brent, said:
 "Unfortunately, this probably means that the developers and Barnet  council are trying to get what they wanted all along, which is the  expansion of their Brent Cross 'out-of-town' shopping centre, with no  other benefits. This is something that my borough, the neighbouring  London Borough of Brent, fought long and hard, but successfully against,  in the late 1990s. That included making a convincing case at an appeal  inquiry to a Planning Inspector, who found in our favour. The Brent  Cross Coalition and Brent Council may have another fight on their hands! 

 
No comments:
Post a Comment