Stonebridge pedestrians and cyclists are fed up with a so-called 'temporary' and uninviting footpath, that has now existed for several years.
Showing posts with label pedestrians. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pedestrians. Show all posts
Wednesday, 5 July 2023
Stonebridge pedestrians and cyclists are fed up with a so-called 'temporary' and uninviting footpath
They have produced these images of the site, just south of the North Circular Road's Ace Cafe, and have asked Wembley Matters to publish it.
Labels:
Brent,
cyclists,
North Circular Road,
pedestrians,
Stonrbridge
Tuesday, 19 October 2021
Some improvement for pedestrians at dangerous Bridge Road/North End Road junction
AFTER
Following concerns registered by Wembley Matters and other Brent residents, the issue of pedestrian safety at the junction of the New North End Road extension and Bridge Road was taken up by local councillor Gaynor Lloyd.
Now bollards have replaced some of the Hostile Vehicle Measures (HMVs) blocks that were on both sides of North End Road. The remaining blocks on the west side were moved back this weekend giving better access to the tactile dropped kerb to wheelchair users, people with buggies and the sight impaired.
It is a slight improvement but there is an urgent need for pedestrian controlled lights and signal improvement for vehicles and cyclists.
Labels:
Bridge Road,
North End Road,
pedestrians,
Wembley Park
Friday, 4 December 2015
Traffic safety measures installed at Asda/Forty Lane in Wembley
The Yellow Box has now been installed at the junction of Asda slip road/Forty Lane/King's Drive following concerns over pedestrian at the crossing.
Pedestrian lights and a yellow box have also been installed further along Forty Lane at The Paddocks junction which should ensure a safer crossing from the bus stop outside the French School (formerly Brent Town Hall) and the Chalkhill Estate.
Labels:
ASDA,
Forty Lane,
pedestrians,
traffic,
Yellow Box
Tuesday, 13 October 2015
Brent Coucil and TfL must take action on dangerous Wembley Asda junction
Watch this video carefully and you will see a woman with a push chair trying to cross Forty Lane at the junction with the Asda slip road and King's Drive, Wembley Park.
The volume of traffic means that vehicles bestride the pedestrian crossing and move across it, even when the green 'man' indicates pedestrians should cross. The traffic lights are positioned on the south side of the junction and there is is no further indicator for vehicles on the pedestrian crossing itself.
I witnessed both adults and children dodging between the moving traffic this morning beyween 8.50 and 9am as they go to school or retrun from dropping children off.
I have tweeted the video to Transport for London and Brent Council calling for urgent action. More traffic build up at peak times has been forecast by Transport for London as a result of the road works at Neasden.
There is bound to be an accident at this spot sooner or later.
Labels:
ASDA,
Brent Council,
Forty Lane,
pedestrians,
traffic,
Transport for London,
wembley
Thursday, 27 February 2014
Three boroughs near solution after long 'dangerous junction' campaign by residents
Crossing photographs from Father David Ackerman |
Positive movement on the Harow Road/Ladbroke Grove Junction! A solution may well be in sight.
On Friday 7th February
representatives from Transport for London, Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea
and Brent councils, West One ( the infrastructure management company employed
by Westminster Council to manage its traffic planning) and Kensal Triangle
Residents Association joined in a meeting kindly organised and hosted by Fr David Ackerman for a
meeting at St John's Vicarage to discuss the Harrow Road /Ladbroke Grove
crossing.
This brought together
professionals and locals to address the need for immediate action. The campaign
for the provision of safe pedestrian crossing facility has been going for
nearly eight years now, and the meeting was arranged to give updates on plans
formulated by West One as a result of the last round of surveys.
The meeting proved to be
positive on all counts. It was agreed
by all that the attempt to improve the situation by providing wider refuges in
the middle of each arm of the junction had not worked at all. West One, in conjunction with TfL are now
recommending to all parties that a system be installed with a phase where all
vehicle traffic is stopped at the junction to allow a pedestrian crossing phase
with the traditional ‘green man’light.
This will allow pedestrians enough time to cross any one arm of the
junction. (it was not proposed to
encourage crossing diagonally over the junction as is the case at Oxford
Circus)
There will also be
consideration of lane confusion, signage and the hold-ups on Kilburn Lane.
West One needs to consult with
the two other councils to ensure that this solution us agreed by all parties,
and further modelling needs to be done to ensure that congestion will not be
increased by the new scheme, but the overall message was that positive and
effective action is being taken to make
the junction safer for pedestrians and drivers.
West One could not give a
precise timetable for implementation for the plan, but hoped to finish the
modelling by the end of March, and installation of the new lights by the end of
2014
The
meeting was also notable for its focus on a solution, and Fr David was glad to
host a meeting that brought together the most important people who can affect
change. It was extremely helpful and
positive to have a meeting so close to the junction concerned, where everyone
could see the scale of the problem.
The Background to a Long Campaign
The Harrow Road/Ladbroke Grove Junction
KTRA have been campaigning to get ‘green man’ lights at this
junction for 8 years.
It took a long time to find out which Borough took
responsibility for the junction as it is on the boundary of three
boroughs. Westminster is the lead
borough, as it has the south east and north east corners. R B K and C has the south west corner and
Brent the North West. This is one of
the difficulties, as funding is complicated due to shared responsibility
between the three boroughs.
Further, as it is a main road, Transport for London is
involved, and has to survey the junction to determine what difference a change
in phasing would make. This also has
implications on funding any changes.
Almost everyone who lives in the area agrees that the
junction is dangerous. It is particularly hazardous for anyone with impaired
mobility or eyesight, and it is a nightmare for parents with children, or
teachers with school groups trying to cross. It is a huge barrier in the way of
any attempts to get more children walking to school
Over the years we have delivered a petition of over 1000
signatures (the previous incumbent at the church collected some of them from
the congregation) two long scrolls of wallpaper covered with drawings and
comments, many form children, asking for the junction to be made safe, and
attended two meetings at Portcullis House arranged by Glenda Jackson with
representatives from all t he boroughs to try and find a way forward. Martin Low from Westminster Council has said
in one of these meetings that he is not averse to the idea of a pedestrian
phase at the lights, but it depends on TfL and price.
Our position is
1). Even though
there have not been any fatalities or major injuries the junction is
dangerous. There are people who get the
bus one stop to Sainsbury’s rather than cross the road there. There is no time when it is safe for
pedestrians to cross any arm of the junction
2) It can only get worse. The junction is used by several
different groups of school children as well as
anyone getting off the number 18 to get a bus going down Ladbroke Grove. In the morning and evening rush hours it is
particularly bad. As the area is
developed more and more there will be more pressure on the junction –
especially as Sainsbury’s remains the only large supermarket in the area.
3) Widening the refuges in the centre of each arm has not
made a difference - most of them did not last a week. They did not tackle the central problem; that it is unsafe to
cross the road.
4) Every junction on the Harrow Road from Harlesden clock to
the Edgeware Road has a pedestrian phase, except this one. There are also numerous pedestrian crossings
along the Harrow Road.
Every Junction on Chamberlaine Road from Kensal Rise Station
down to the Harrow Road has a pedestrian phase.
There are no traffic lights
on Ladbroke Grove until you get to Ladbroke Grove Station, where there
is a separate pedestrian crossing controlled by lights. It is obviously generally accepted that on
all of these roads pedestrian safety needs to be ensured by the provision of
light controlled crossings.
5) We consider that putting a pedestrian phase into the
Crossing will not cause more traffic queues.
Coming down Chaimberlaine Road from Kensal Rise the traffic
is held up by the lights at Harvist Road and Bannister Road: it is more often
than not fairly clear after both of these junctions until cars reach the bend
by Ilbert Street: congestion is caused there by the narrowness of the road and
parked cars at any time of day or night.
Crossing the Harrow Road is relatively straightforward, except for right
turning vehicles.
Coming up Ladbroke Grove, congestion is caused by the two
roundabouts at Barlby road and the entrance to Sainsbury’s. This can cause tailbacks to Ladbroke Grove
Station. Once over the roundabout at
Sainsbury’s cars move freely to join a short queue at the Harrow Road lights
There is congestion all along the Harrow Road from
Harlesden: it can take seven minutes to get from the Scrubs Lane Junction to the
lights at Kensal Green Station. There
is then usually some clear road before the tailback at the Ladbroke Grove
Junction. This tailback is caused by
the poor layout of the junction and the bus lane. The road essentially becomes single lane, with space for only
four or five cars to pull into the left hand lane at the junction in front of
the number 18 bus stop. Consequently, most of the cars wishing to continue east
along the Harrow Road are stuck behind cars attempting to turn right into
Ladbroke Grove – and only about four of these make it across the junction in
any given phase of the lights. Moving
the bus stop back a few yard would help – it is still set up for the now
defunct bendy buses, and does not need
to be anything like as long as it is.
There is much less problem for traffic coming out of Central
London on the Harrow Road: there are two lanes and a left filter lane at eh
junction, and although it is still nerve-racking for vehicles turning right up
Kilburn Lane, cars going straight on or turning left are not impeded.
A light system with a pedestrian phase, and with right turn
filters on the traffic phases would be of benefit to pedestrians and drivers
alike
Labels:
Brent,
crossing,
Harrow Road,
Kensal Triangle Residents Association,
Kensingon Chelsea,
Kilburn Lane,
Ladbroke Grove,
pedestrians,
traffic,
Transport for London,
Westminster
Thursday, 26 July 2012
Councillors back Asda petrol station despite local opposition
Pedestrian routes at Forty Lane/King's Drive/Asda junction |
Planners admitted that the nearby road junction at Bridge Road/Forty Avenue/Forty Lane/Barn Hill was operating at full capacity but claimed that 100 yards down the road the Forty Lane/King's Drive/Asda junction (above) had spare capacity.
Cllr Shafique Choudhary (Labour -Barnhill) drew attention to the health hazards posed by petrol fueling stations to nearby residents and foodstuffs at the store, less thyan 100 metres from the proposed fueling station..He particularly focused on the carcinogenic properties of benzine. Steve Weeks of Brebt Planning said these dangers were known about but that the problem was being addressed nationally through redesign of petrol. Cllr Ann John remarked that many petrol stations had food stores and nearby flats without any problems.
Cllr Michael Pavey, the Labour winner of the recent Barnhill by-election, lambasted the planning officers'; report for being base don old data, lacking specific figures and being based on trip figures submitted by Asda and accepted by officers without an independent check. He said that the business model submitted by Asda which claimed that it would not be in 'aggressive' competition with other petrol providers lacked credibility - in fact Asda prides itself on low prices and will draw in additional customers. A check revealed that current Asda prices at their petrol stations were 3-5p cheaper that other local facilities and he could not see Asda charging higher prices in Wembley than it did elsewhere. The 2009 traffic figures did not take into account school expansions in the area. He concluded that the application should be rejected on the grounds that the officers' report was unsubstantial, unanalysed and untrustworthy.
Rachel McConnell for the planning department said that the trips data was based on national data as well as Asda's own experience of their other petrol stations. The peak flow was 2,300-2,400 cars and there would be only 43 extra trips caused by the petrol station, and this did not take into account trips that would be made to the store anyway.
Earlier I had made a presentation on behalf of the Chalkhill Primary School Governing body. I noted that we had not been formally consulted about the plans despite the school being close to the proposed site - we had only heard about the application through our community contacts.
As a governing body we are responsible for the safety of pupils both in school and on their way to school. In line with Brent Council policy, for environmental and health reasons, we encourage children to walk to school. However, in the case of this development there appeared to be a conflict with our duty of care to keep children safe and implementation of the walking to school policy. If the petrol station were to be built increased traffic (at the 7 crossing points marked in blue - two not pedestrian controlled) would put children walking to school in more danger. There were already problems with people avoiding the multiple blue crossing points by walking straight across Forty Lane from the Town Hall bus stop (red line on map) to the chestnut tree lined avenue leading to Chalkhill Estate and the school. There had been traffic accidents at the junction and injuries to pedestrians at the unofficial crossing.
I further contended that the planners' report did not take into account the increased vehicular and pedestrian traffic which would result from the expansion of schools places in the area. Ark Academy (secondary) is due to add a further 540 secondary school places over the next 3 years, Ark Academy Primary 180, Preston Manor Primary 180 and if plans to be discussed by the Executive on August 20th go ahead a further 210 or 420 at Chalkhill Primary. This amounts to more than 1,000 extra journeys when planners admit that the morning peak is already higher than in 2009. Overall the report focused on vehicles and not on pedestrians.
In addition when Brent Town Hall is sold off next year, depending on its new use which could be retail or hotel, further journeys may be generated. Surely planners should take into account future pressures as well as the current situation?
The lone voice that spoke in favour of the proposal was that of former Independent Conservative Group councillor Robert Dunwell. Speaking on behalf of Ban Hill Residents Association (2004) he supported the application 'in principle' as being a good amenity for the store and for the surrounding community. He suggested that there could be a delay while the problem of capacity at the Bridge Road/Forty Avenue was dealt with. Barn Hill Residents Association (without the 2004 in brackets!) has opposed the proposal on grounds of increased traffic.
I have to record that the points I raised were not addressed by planning committee councillors or officers. I remain seriously concerned about the safety of children walking to school from King's Drive and Pilgrims Way estates (bottom right of map) as well as those using the Town Hall bus stop.
Labels:
ASDA,
Brent Council,
Chalkhill Primary School,
Michael Pavey,
pedestrians,
petrol station,
planning,
Shafique Choudhary,
wembley
Friday, 10 December 2010
Vote for the Ice Factor - forget the X Factor this weekend
If like me you are fed up with the priority given to cars after snow and ice - with roads gritted and cleared and pavements left for us to slip and slide on, then you may be interested in Living Streets' campaign on behalf of pedestrians.
Follow this LINK to take part in their 'Ice Factor' game (a totally different meaning to 'break a leg' than the X Factor)a fun way to bring the message home.
Living Streets are calling for local authorities to agree a winter contract with communities, committing to:
Follow this LINK to take part in their 'Ice Factor' game (a totally different meaning to 'break a leg' than the X Factor)a fun way to bring the message home.
Living Streets are calling for local authorities to agree a winter contract with communities, committing to:
- Make sure that a severe weather plan is in place that sets out what the Council will do to reduce the impact of severe weather on all road users – including pedestrians
- Make sure that paths are gritted so that everyone, including older, younger and disabled people, is still able to walk to essential services
- Send staff and contractors to help clear pavements if they are unable to carry out their main job because of the severe weather
- Keep all grit bins filled so that grit can be used where it is needed
- Coordinate a list of volunteers who can be activated by email to help clear streets and alert the local public to help.
Labels:
Brent Council,
ice,
Living Street,
pedestrians
Monday, 16 August 2010
Vulnerable road users to be safeguarded in traffic signal removals
Brent Council have said that they will only undertake any traffic signal removals in the borough suggested by Transport for London if "it can be undertaken in a safe, practical and cost effective manner without undue negative impact on more vulnerable road users or more sustainable modes of transport." The Transportation Unit were responding to my enquiry following the publication of a list of traffic signals that Boris Johnson wanted to see considered for removal. DETAILS HERE
The council said:
The council said:
Brent have only recently been informed by TfL of its proposals to look at reducing delays caused by inefficient or unnecessary traffic signals, at which time we were made aware of a list of potential traffic signal removal site including the Neasden Lane/Quainton St/Braemar Avenue junction. We will shortly be holding our first meeting with TfL to discuss the details of the project after which we will hopefully be in a better position to understand how it will be taken forward. I am therefore currently unable to provide you any specific information regarding the Neasden Lane/Quainton St/Braemar Avenue junction. I can however say that Brent shares TfL’s desire to reduce congestion on our network, but only where it can be undertaken in a safe, practical and cost effective manner without undue negative impact on more vulnerable road users or more sustainable modes of transport.
We will need to be vigilant to ensure that the council's criteria for removal are rigorously applied.
Labels:
Boris Johnson,
crossings,
pedestrians,
TfL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)