The Friends of Kensal Rise Library have sent a preliminary list to Brent
Council of what it claims are fraudulent statements of support for the proposal
of developer Andrew Gillick of Kensal Properties Ltd to put seven dwellings and
a small space for community use into the former Kensal Rise Library.
The campaigners believe that the addresses of residents have been used
without their consent and empty buildings and invented addresses have been used
in order to influence and mislead the public and the planning committee of Brent
Council who will decide if the proposal is to go ahead.
The ‘Friends’ intend to follow up this list later this week with another
tranche of, what they believe, are fraudulent statements of support.
A number of residents have already sent complaints to the council.
Faye Bradbury, a local resident commented:
Brent Council has reacted promptly with the Lead Member for the Environment, Roxanne Mashari sending the list to the head of Brent’s legal department with a request for an investigation and report as soon as possible.It is an outrage support has been listed in my name. I've always supported the Save Kensal Rise Library campaign.
It is understood that the list has also been sent to Boris Johnson the
Mayor of London.
Margaret Bailey Chair of the Trustees of the Friends said:
All Souls College, who are still the legal owners of the building and who have entered an agreement with the developer Andrew Gillick of Kensal Properties to sell the property, have been notified of the suspicious statements of support.We have taken advice from the Metropolitan Police and they advised in the first instance that we lodge a complaint with the council. We have done this and the council will investigate and produce a report as soon as possible. This is a very serious matter as fraud is illegal under the Fraud Act 2006. Naturally we hope any investigation by Brent Council or potentially the police will show who has lodged these statements of support.
Local investigations will continue.
Similar allegations were made in the planning consultation for the Willesden Green Library development as the commenter blow has reminded us LINK
Similar allegations were made in the planning consultation for the Willesden Green Library development as the commenter blow has reminded us LINK
1 comment:
Something very similar happened with the Willesden Green Library redevelopment consultation: http://keepwillesdengreen.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/gt-comment-on-suspicious-surge-in.html#comment-form.
Many of the letters supporting the new scheme were templates, thus contravening the Council's own rules on valid submissions.
Alex Colas
Post a Comment