Guest post by David Walton
This review https://londonfloodreview.co.uk/ published in May 2022 states that:
"New sewer systems are typically designed such that all flows are contained within the sewer (no flooding at ground level) up to a 1-in 30 year return period. Older sewer systems do not have the same requirements and often have a capacity much less than the current 1-in-30 year standard. While the Victorian sewer system for London had ample capacity at the time of its construction, the evolution of the cityscape has had an effect on the ability of the sewer system to cope with the current flows which drain to it. This results in areas of London with sewers which cannot cope with a 1-in-5 year event, despite Thames Water’s continuous upgrade in the sewer network where performance issues are identified".
See London Flooding Review Maida Vale Study Area. Its red line includes the South Kilburn Growth Area Tall Building Zone.
"We confirm that the scale of the events experienced in July far exceeds any design standards for sewer systems and acknowledge it may not be economical or practicable to implement schemes to eliminate risk for a similar event. Whilst we report specifically on the performance of Thames Water’s assets, due to the scale of the events in July 2021, and the flooding mechanisms, multiple organisations had a duty of care and responsibility to their customers, so the responsibility does not lie wholly with Thames Water."
"Typically, Thames Water uses a 1-in-30 year return period design standard for new flood protection schemes; with a range of duration storm events….it is recommended to apply climate change factors to design rainfall, increasing the intensity of the rainfall event."
The question, is can South Kilburn Growth Area Tall Building Zone re-development ongoing for 21 years thus far, in legal terms be classified as 'new'? Maida Vale Flooding Review Study Area includes South Kilburn Growth Area Tall Building Zone a low bowl with hills around in the stage 3 report.
"Analysis of the current network identifies that some drainage systems can be predicted to flood in less than a 1-in-5 year return period rainfall, with properties being affected by frequent flooding. This is true of all major cities in the UK and is not specific to London."
"Maida Vale is situated in a low spot, and has the Ranelagh trunk sewer (River Westbourne), Mid Level No. 2 sewer and the North Western Storm Relief sewer running through it. When the Ranelagh sewer is surcharged, flows can back up into connected basements."
"Cambridge Gardens (Brent) consists of a new Flooding Local Improvement Project (installation of package pumping stations for individual properties with non-return valves) to isolate individual properties from the sewer network."
5 homes in South Kilburn fitted so far by Thames Water.
"The Maida Vale Study Area was defined using LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging topographic) data to identify the topographic area where surface flows could contribute to the tank, which is located in a low spot. The extent of the (low spot) study area can be seen in Figure 5.5."
.
Page 55 of the London Flooding Review pictures Chippenham Gardens, Brent, that in July 2021 become a sewage lake.
"We confirm that the scale of the events experienced in July (2021) far exceeds any current design standards for sewer systems and it may not be economical or practicable to implement schemes to eliminate risk for a similar event. We will also look at more holistic recommendations, such as ways of Thames Water responding to similar incidents in the future, increased monitoring and warning systems, engagement with customers, and how TW, and possibly the wider industry, could consider setting out their modelling approach and design criteria for flood alleviation schemes in the future. Due to the scale of the events in July 2021, multiple organisations had a duty of care and responsibility to their customers, so the responsibility does not lie wholly with Thames Water. We will look at how data and communications are shared across organisations, what community groups and individuals can do to improve their own resilience and how planning policy can be changed to reduce flood risk and the impact of flooding."
Brent the Lead Local Flood Authority should protect and invest in what remains of South Kilburns public owned modern natural parks and bowls flood defence system built in the 1960's and 70's.
David Walton
FLASK (Flood Local Action South Kilburn)
2 comments:
BIG THANKS to Wembley Matters for following Brent flood escalation issues.
Brent has its Master Developer hat welded on, but Brent really needs to find its Lead Local Flood Authority and Climate Emergency hats and for pandemic/ cost of living crisis dust them off too!
Brent is yet to participate and engage with the London Flooding Review (now working on stage 4 of its 4 stages), while Brent's Section 19 Flood Investigation Report (at Brent first) remains withheld in draft form- no doubt until after LFR stage 4 final report is published.
The Higgins re-development 52 flats, private sale, Help-to-Buy and affordable at Chippenham Gardens, pictured July 2021 as a sewage flooded site in the London Flood Review stage 3, is having a 1 metre high engineering brick wall as an afterthought built around it to flooding protect. John Ratcliffe House built in the 1970's is raised with all of its flats 4 metres above river floods level, but scores of other local homes are ground level or basement flats (Brent encourages this Local Centre villages shops to be converted into flats bit-by-bit style).
Serous flood detriment escalation being lead Local Flood Authority reduced at Chippenham Gardens today requires the being renewed public square green space here being a good sized rain garden with strong future protection and maintenance guarantees instead of being categorised a Brent highways land bank opportunity?
South Kilburn Growth Area Tall Building Low Spot Zone 45 hectares, numerous new builds since 2001 regeneration year zero and 35 new sites building towards 2041. Is South Kilburn not 'new' and given it is or was until very recent times all public owned land, why is the 'new' Masterplan not interested in meeting the Thames Water 1-in-30 year return period design standard for flood protection? (A bit like why do new green active travel routes to stations not dominate a 45 hectare car-free, no-gardens, mega density new housing zones Masterplan?)
This same 1-in- 30 year flooding standard for 'new' Masterplans should apply to all 8 Brent Growth Area zones. Why build back worse and ignore known environmental risks to lives and properties being packed in new at mega population densities UK as yet not seen? The London Flood Review puts the flooding standard lower than 1-in-5 years to flood South Kilburn at its present overdevelopment, pave-all, road-all, low spot, obsolete Victorian combined sewers- 'new' intensification levelling down.
BIG THANKS to Wembley Matters for following Brent flood escalation issues.
Brent has its Master Developer commercial hat welded on, but Brent really needs to find its Lead Local Flood Authority and Climate Emergency hats and for pandemic/ cost of living crisis dust them off too!
Brent is yet to participate and engage with the London Flooding Review (now working on stage 4 of its 4 stages), while Brent's Section 19 Flood Investigation Report (will be a Brent first) remains withheld in draft form- unhelpfully until after LFR stage 4 final report is published?
Failures predicted and predictable…… The Higgins re-development 52 flats, private sale, Help-to-Buy and affordable at Chippenham Gardens, pictured July 2021 as a sewage flooded site page 55 in the London Flood Review stage 3, is having a 1 metre high engineering brick wall as an afterthought built around it to flooding protect this asset. John Ratcliffe House built in the 1970's is raised with all of its flats 4 metres above sewage flooded street level, but scores of other local homes are at ground level or basement flats (Brent encourages this Local Centre villages shops to be converted into flats bit-by-bit style).
Serous flood detriment escalation being lead Local Flood Authority reduced at Chippenham Gardens today requires the renewed public square green space here being a good sized rain garden with strong future protection and maintenance guarantees instead of being categorised a Brent highways land bank opportunity?
South Kilburn Growth Area Tall Building 'Low Spot' Zone 45 hectares, numerous new builds since 2001 regeneration year zero and 35 new sites building towards 2041. Is South Kilburn not 'new' and given it is (or was) until very recent times all public owned land, why is the 'new' Masterplan not interested in meeting the Thames Water 1-in-30 year return period design standard for local flood protection? (A bit like why do new green active travel routes to stations not dominate a 45 hectare car-free, no-gardens, mega density new housing zones new Masterplan?)
This same 1-in- 30 year flooding standard for 'new' Masterplans should apply to all 8 Brent Growth Area zones 2022. Why build back worse and ignore known environmental risk to lives and properties being packed in new at mega population densities? The London Flood Review puts the flooding standard below 1-in-5 years to flood again South Kilburn at its present overdevelopment, pave-all, road-all, low spot, obsolete Victorian combined sewers- 'new' intensification levelling down progress?
Post a Comment