As a respected community and voluntary sector organisation doing valuable work in the borough, we are writing to you to make you aware of the second of a series of events called It’s Time to Talk - focussing on important matters affecting our local community. The event will take place at Brent Civic Centre on the 3rd of October 2016 at 6pm, discussing the challenging issue of extremism in all its forms. We would like to take this opportunity to invite all members of the community and voluntary sector in Brent to the event.Since the above invitation was sent to me a further speaker has been added: Dr Varun Uberoi of Brunel Univsity. The meeting will be chaired by Cllr Michael Pavey, Brent Council lead member for Stronger Communities.
There will be a number of high-profile speakers attending including Alex Krasodomski-Jones of the think-tank Demos, Dr Sara Silvestri of City University London and a number of other speakers who will participate in a ‘question time’ style event on this challenging but important issue. Attendees will be asked to submit their questions online prior to the event.This event is part of the Council’s wider It’s Time to Talk campaign which aims to empower residents and community leaders to talk about difficult issues like this one and work together with partners to tackle them. If you would like to have your say on the issues, please come along to this FREE event and help us create a stronger, safer Brent.
It strikes me as insulting that there is not a single member of the local community, or a local community voluntary organisation on the platform. They are just there as audience to hear from the experts. Surely these grassroots organisations are experts on how the government's approach to extremism is affecting people locally?
Local organisations have challenged Cllr Butt, the leader of the Council, on its implementation of the Prevent programme, without success and were unable to elicit any information from him about which local organisations he had consulted on the issue. A request to him from An-Nisa, a group working in Brent for more than 30 years, to facilitate a meeting with Brent headteachers on the extremism issue, and particularly the implementation of Prevent in schools, has also met with no response.
Prevent itself has been criticised by Shadow Home Secretary Andy Burnham who said:
The Prevent duty to report extremist behaviour is today’s equivalent of internment in Northern Ireland – a policy felt to be highly discriminatory against one section of the community.An Early Day Motion has been tabled in the House of Commons reflecting community concerns over Prevent:
That single event (9/11) shocked us out of the optimism and unity that had been so tangible just five years before. That is exactly what it was designed to do, just like the Manchester bomb, but this time, instead of building bridges, we seem to have slipped back into the language of division, suspicion and alienation.
Early Day Motion 425If the policy stigmatises and alienates the Muslim community it appears entirely wrong to leave them off a platform where there is a real danger of the presentations being academic and unconnected with the real issues on the ground - although of course I may be proved wrong.
That this House welcomes the Government's strong commitment to keeping Britain safe from terrorist attacks; believes that the Prevent strategy is no longer fit for purpose to serve this agenda; notes that there is little evidence to support Prevent or the conveyor belt theory of radicalisation; further notes that no impact evaluations or indicators are available that show Prevent has been successful; further believes that the severe lack of transparency with the Prevent strategy strongly undermines it; notes that Prevent has had a worrying impact on freedom of expression at schools, colleges and universities; believes that the behavioural indicators of possible extremism are vague and unhelpful; believes that the rhetoric of British values is alienating to many who already believed in those values and encourages ministers to adopt a more inclusive approach and rebrand these as universal values; is strongly concerned that the British Muslim community has been particularly stigmatised by Prevent; encourages ministers to engage with affected communities and their relevant grievances, including around foreign policy issues; further encourages ministers to engage with community actors and organisations that have grassroots credibility; believes that ultimately extremism is best tackled by the Government working in partnership with communities and engendering genuine two-way trust, neither of which Prevent has enabled; and therefore calls on ministers to scrap the Prevent strategy in its entirety and replace it with a community-led programme that builds institutions and resilience for tackling social problems, has grassroots credibility and empowers communities rather than alienating them.
These are notes on the panel:
Alex Krasodomski-Jones (Demos):
Alex is a researcher of the Centre for the Analysis of Social Media. His primary research interest is political extremism and its reportage on social media. He also manages CASM’s analytics capability, including data collection, analytics and visualisation.Dr Sara Silvestri (City University):
Alex is a frequent media commentator, and writes regularly for the Huffington Post and Spectator. He led Demos’ project mapping the political Twittersphere ahead of the 2015 General Election, which was launched on BBC Newsnight
Dr Silvestri has directed the Islam in Europe programme at the European Policy Centre (Brussels) and has been a research consultant to the British Council, Ethnobarometer, the European Commission, and the British Government. Prior to that, she had worked in the Cabinet of the European Commission President and had been an Associate Fellow with Chatham House (London).Dr Varun Uberoi (Brunel University):
As an expert on Islam in Europe, religion, and intercultural relations, Sara serves in the advisory board of the British Council's 'Our Shared Future' programme, the ESRC 'Radicalisation Research' portal, and the EuroMediterranean Foundation Anna Lindh (for which she contributed to the first Gallup opinion poll of the EuroMediterranean region).
She is also a member of the scientific committee of GIERFI (a network for the study of Islam and women in Europe) and is a member of the UN Alliance of Civilizations' Global Experts group.
I combine normative political theory and political science to examine the theory and practice of fostering unity amongst the culturally diversity citizens of modern polities. My theoretical work examines what unity amongst the citizens of a polity is, how it differs from similar ideas like loyalty and belonging, why such unity is important and how it can be fostered ethically. My empirical work utilises archival and elite interview data to examine how the governments of two parliamentary democracies, Britain and Canada, have attempted to foster such unity as well as the role that Muslims often play in contemporary debates about unity.Michael Pavey, none the less, sees this event as involving the community, and reflects some of the approach recommendations of the EDM:
The issue of extremism, and how best to prevent it, is a complex, emotive, and highly debated one.I am far from convinced that this event, given the format, will fulfil Pavey's aim.
Here in Brent, our aim is to use this event to really involve the community and create real, community-led solutions to tackle the issue of extremism, in all its forms, in our Borough. I hope that residents from all backgrounds will come along and share their ideas.
To attend you need a ticket available HERE
5 comments:
This date 3rd October - is also the 1st day of the Jewish New Year-(5777). A High Holy day that does not include travel or visits to public meetings in its observance. Sara who is sitting on the panel should have known this and could have advised the organizers accordingly to get full community engagement.
Martin
A strange post. Your point about having community orgs on the table is a fair one - although who? - but the rest of your post is unbalanced. An-Nisa have had the ear of Butt on Prevent but are not interested in listening to a balanced perspective on Prevent; so why should they be given a platform?
Burnham's comments have been derided as totally inaccurate (he fails to notice that Prevent covers all forms of extremism including the far right) and the EDM is a nonsense (which is why it only has three signatures). Exactly why it's a nonsense is below:
That this House welcomes the Government's strong commitment to keeping Britain safe from terrorist attacks; believes that the Prevent strategy is no longer fit for purpose to serve this agenda;
The Prevent strategy is held up as the leading strategy to prevent violent extremism in the world.
notes that there is little evidence to support Prevent or the conveyor belt theory of radicalisation;
Prevent does not use the "conveyor belt theory" - in fact the Prevent Strategy specifically mentions that this is not the case - suggesting that Carmichael does not know what he's talking about.
further notes that no impact evaluations or indicators are available that show Prevent has been successful;
Just as one example - Prevent has stopped 150 people from travelling to Syria. Given that around 20% of those who've travelled have been killed, that's around 30 lives saved. Seems quite successful to me.
further believes that the severe lack of transparency with the Prevent strategy strongly undermines it;
Prevent is as transparent as national security allows.
notes that Prevent has had a worrying impact on freedom of expression at schools, colleges and universities;
These are still safe spaces to discuss anything, and Prevent does not alter that. All it does it ask for safeguarding referrals if a student appears to be at risk - just like you would do for sexual exploitation etc.
believes that the behavioural indicators of possible extremism are vague and unhelpful;
Peer reviewed in psychological journals.
believes that the rhetoric of British values is alienating to many who already believed in those values and encourages ministers to adopt a more inclusive approach and rebrand these as universal values;
Not Prevent
is strongly concerned that the British Muslim community has been particularly stigmatised by Prevent;
Not stigmatised - protected
encourages ministers to engage with affected communities and their relevant grievances, including around foreign policy issues;
should be doing that anyway, although the idea of foreign policy as the key driver for extremism has been debunked
further encourages ministers to engage with community actors and organisations that have grassroots credibility;
Many grassroots orgs work with Prevent and millions of pounds of funding have gone into them (including An Nisa).
believes that ultimately extremism is best tackled by the Government working in partnership with communities and engendering genuine two-way trust, neither of which Prevent has enabled;
That's the key cornerstone of Prevent
and therefore calls on ministers to scrap the Prevent strategy in its entirety and replace it with a community-led programme that builds institutions and resilience for tackling social problems, has grassroots credibility and empowers communities rather than alienating them.
That's what Prevent does. Carmichael might want to go and find out before tabling such nonsensical motions. Similarly people attending on 3 Oct might want to read up and educate themselves before making false claims.
Dear Anonymous - from your comment it is obvious that you are not following the local Prevent agenda adequately or you are not engaged with what is happening within communities to understand their concerns. You seem to have a disjointed awareness of the communication process between An-Nisa Society and Brent Council. You have every right to support Prevent if you wish as much as you have the right to go around blinkered to the reality and to be unconcerned about human rights. Since you have signed as anonymous it is difficult to know where you are coming from or exactly what point you are trying to make. As a Brent resident for over 50 years and a local community group for over 30 years I think I can speak with some conviction both about my own personal experiences as well as the impact of Prevent on the ground.
What saddens me most about Brent Council is that it is playing hollow lip service to all the values that so many of us have worked for over the decades - through difficult and good times.
Humera Khan, An-Nisa Society
I have explained exactly why the criticisms made are not valid; and I see nothing in your response that is specific to the delivery of Prevent in Brent.
Well, I was trying to answer Carmichael's criticisms of the national Prevent strategy to reassure you, but you still haven't articulated exactly what your concerns are about the delivery of Prevent in BRENT.
Post a Comment