WEMBLEY MATTERS
News and views on local politics, the environment, climate change, culture and local history
Saturday, 3 December 2016
Ealing and Hammersmith & Fulham Councils show Brent how to campaign on the STP
It is just not possible for me to go to every vital meeting that I advertise on Wembley Matters so I am posting this account from the Hammersmith and Fulham website of their public meeting on the NW London Sustainability and Transformation Plan. How about a similar meeting in Brent, Brent Council?
The decision by
Hammersmith & Fulham and Ealing councils to refuse ‘secretive’
hospital closure plans was backed by hundreds at a packed town hall
meeting this week.
Nearly 700 cheered and applauded the leaders of the councils as they
explained why they have refused to sign up to the local NHS
Sustainability and Transformation Plan (STP). Councils across the UK
have been asked to endorse similar plans for each region of the NHS,
before they are submitted to government for approval.
“The STP is a deeply cynical re-hash of the earlier flawed plans
which now proposes to close Charing Cross Hospital in 2021,” said Cllr
Stephen Cowan, Leader of Hammersmith & Fulham Council.
“There are no good arguments for demolishing Charing Cross or for
selling off much of the land and replacing it with an urgent care clinic
just 13 per cent the size of the hospital. That’s why this
administration will continue its fierce defence of Charing Cross and the
vital local NHS services people rely on.”
The meeting drew campaigners from across the region who have been
fighting plans to close or downgrade services at five out of the nine
hospitals in north west London.
Despite the published plans, an NHS spokesman has said: “We want to
reassure our staff, patients, local residents and partners that Charing
Cross is not closing and that there will be no reduction in the
hospital’s A&E and wider services during the lifetime of the STP,
which runs until April 2021.”
Anne Drinkell, of the Save our Hospitals campaign, said: “This is a
cuts and closures programme. We’re not saying we want no change. But
objectively there’s already not enough capacity in our local hospital so
closing more services would be unsafe.”
Campaigners were united in condemning the tactics being used to force
through drastic reductions in local health services secretively and
without public consultation.
The NHS has pressured councils to approve STPs by linking it to the
release of vital government cash needed to keep councils’ social care
services from collapsing under ever-rising demand.
But Cllr Julian Bell, Leader of Ealing Council, said: “The NHS tried
to bounce us into signing the STP. They tried to get us to agree to the
STP on the basis of a two-page summary and they told us we didn’t need
to see the full document. We insisted, but it didn’t arrive until they
day before we were meant to sign it. And once we finally saw what was in
it, we understood why. There was no way on earth I was going to sign up
to those plans.”
Dr David Wingfield, chairman of the Hammersmith and Fulham GP
Federation, suggested the STP was not equipped to tackle the health and
social care problems facing the borough. He offered to form a ‘grand
alliance’ between GPs, councillors and members of the community to
confront local healthcare challenges.
No comments:
Post a Comment